Designing STEM Curricula With Industry in Malaysia

By: Retave’s Research Desk Editor

Listen to this article

A research policy is only as good as the people trained to carry it out, and the National Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy (NSTIP) 2021–2030 spends an entire thrust on exactly that problem. Thrust 4, Adaptive Science, Technology, and Innovation (STI) Talent, aims to build a competent, adaptable pool of scientists, technologists, and innovators who can withstand rapid global economic and technological change. Strategy B of that thrust, Leading Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education, is where the policy gets specific about how universities and industry are supposed to build that pipeline together, starting well before graduation.

One module, built actually to work

The policy’s starting point is blunt: STEM teaching in its current form isn’t pulling in enough students or holding their interest. Initiative B1 calls for a transdisciplinary STEM teaching and learning module that’s more standardized across the system than what exists now, but also more engaging, built around hands-on experience instead of lecture-and-memorize delivery. NSTIP is explicit that the module’s design shouldn’t be left to educators alone. Industry’s views and needs are meant to be built into the curriculum from the start, so graduates come out already speaking the language employers use.

That’s a shift in who gets a seat at the curriculum-design table. It places industry partners alongside academics as co-authors of what a STEM classroom actually teaches, because a standardized module must align with job market demands if it’s going to do its job. The policy frames this as a two-part outcome that must be achieved together: a uniform STEM education module and a learning module that meets industry’s needs.

Folding TVET into the same curriculum

Initiative B2 pushes the same idea further, folding Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) modules directly into STEM curriculum design and closing the gap with technical and vocational training that previously ran on a separate track. NSTIP calls for TVET education modules to be streamlined and integrated into STEM curricula to create what the policy describes as a more comprehensive STEM education, one that blends academic STI knowledge with practical technical skills rather than keeping the two on separate career paths.

The initiative names institutions of higher learning (IHLs) specifically as the parties that need to work with industry to design STEM and TVET curricula based on real industry needs. That’s a direct ask of universities and polytechnics: don’t just teach the fundamentals and hope graduates pick up practical skills on the job, build the practical requirements into the syllabus alongside the theory, with industry partners involved in shaping what that syllabus contains.

What the policy expects this to produce

The National Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy frames the payoff in fairly direct terms. A STEM and TVET curriculum jointly developed by Institutions of higher learning and industry is meant to produce STI talent who are knowledgeable, skilled, and positive-minded, aligned with industry’s actual needs, and better equipped to adapt as the global economy and its technology continue to shift beneath them. That’s a narrower goal than simply raising STEM enrolment numbers. It’s asking for graduates who can walk into a lab or a production line and be useful faster, because the curriculum that trained them was shaped by the people doing the hiring.

For universities, Strategy B effectively extends the collaboration model NSTIP already applies to research funding and shared facilities into the lecture hall. Under this policy, the industry sits at the table while the degree itself gets designed, well before a single graduate walks out looking for a job.